Defendant

A Imprisonment for three years, each of Defendant C, D, and E shall be punished by imprisonment for one year and six months, and Defendant F shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the actual operator of R Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “R”) and S Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “S”) and a person conducting private-public rental housing business, and Defendant C, D, and E are the employees of R and S (hereinafter “each of the instant companies”), and Defendant F is the investigation and police officers of the police station corresponding to the Cheongju.

[2010Gohap53]

1. According to the Rental Housing Act amended by Act No. 7598, Jul. 13, 2005, Defendant A, C, D, and E were aware of the fact that, if a rental business operator purchased a security deposit insurance for a victim's house guarantee company (hereinafter referred to as "Korean house guarantee company"), the lessee could not refund the security deposit due to a rental business operator's default, it was difficult to obtain a security deposit insurance for the rental deposit for the lessee, while operating the T Apartment, U apartment, V apartment, and S sold in R to the general public while operating the rental business for the apartment leased to the general public, he purchased a security deposit insurance for the house guarantee for the purpose of avoiding the lessee's obligation to refund the security deposit for the lessee.

Defendant

A, C, D, and E have concluded a false rental contract which allows a false tenant to move into an apartment unsold in lots, and subscribed to a guarantee insurance for rental deposits for the housing of Korea, and the property of each company of this case to be deducted from all of the companies established by Defendant A, C, D, and E in a so-called related company established by Defendant A, C, D, and E, thereby making each company of this case in a manner that did not pay the proposed bill intentionally, and thereby making the company of this case defaulted in a manner that did not pay the proposed bill for payment, thereby allowing the Korea Housing Guarantee to pay the rental deposit

Defendant A during the above-mentioned period (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant A”).