logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 남원지원 2018.12.18 2018고단245
특수재물손괴등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 1, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of ten years for special bodily injury in the support of the Southern District Court of the Jeonju on October 1, 2018, and the judgment was finalized on September 14, 2018.

The Defendant was managed as a member of one family strike, who is a violence organization that acts in the area south of the Republic of Korea, and was managed as a member of the action group of the victim C (38 Do) who was another violent organization, told his family members of the Defendant that he would have called the “retirement from organized life” to the members of the other violent organization, and sought to the “E” located in the south-si operated by the victim.

1. The Defendant who damages special property at around 00:50 on May 21, 2018, at around 00:50, the 3 room at the above “E” main point, “F, an employee of the said main point and a partner of the victim, shall be accompanied by the number of the employees of the said main point and F, who are within 20 minutes, of the victim’s trade.

The term “Bloker’s World Cups and Yang-ju’s World Cups on the table table are collected to monitor their musical instruments, string the monitors, string the boxes, and studs in the corridor, studs, and studs in the studs and 2 studs of the above main points, and studs in the studs and 2studs, and string off the monitors of singing machines in each room.

Accordingly, the Defendant damaged three monitors of singing machines owned by the victim with approximately 1.5 million market value.

2. On May 21, 2018, from around 00:50 to around 01:10 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) told his employees to “outing all customers” while avoiding the disturbance of gathering connections and cups, as described in paragraph (1) from the foregoing “E” to the said “E; and (b) let them drink and drink out of the main shop.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's main business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement protocol with respect to G and C;

1. 112 A list of reported cases;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Organizational Violence Individual Card (A, C) 1.

arrow