The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal by the accused (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable;

2. The circumstances favorable to the defendant include the fact that the defendant led to the confession of the crime, and the fact that the defendant suffered an injury from the victim.

On the other hand, the fact that the defendant was punished by imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties and again commits the crime of this case during the period of repeated crime, there are many records that the defendant was punished for the same crime, and that the defendant did not receive a letter from the victim is disadvantageous to the defendant.

In addition, the sentencing conditions of the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, motive and circumstance of the crime of this case, and circumstances after the crime of this case are considered in comprehensive consideration of the range of recommended sentencing guidelines established by the Supreme Court sentencing committee, the sentence of the court below is too heavy.

The defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.