1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendant are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. The relationship between the parties is the mother of the plaintiff B and C.

B. While the Plaintiff’s surgery against Plaintiff A had symptoms of radioactive raying to the right side of the pain, the Plaintiff received “the instant surgery” from Defendant medical personnel, including D, a doctor in charge at the hospital affiliated with the Hen University, run by the Defendant for seven hours (based on anesthesia hours) from September 28, 2011 to around 08:20 to 15:15 (hereinafter “the instant surgery”).

C. The Plaintiff A’s infection occurred, but the heat continued, and on October 7, 201, the Defendant medical personnel inspected the Plaintiff’s self-explosion filming equipment on the part of the Plaintiff. As a result of the inspection, the infection and fright infection were confirmed, and as a result, the Defendant’s medical personnel showed that the Plaintiff’s infection and fright infection were “ploating infection by the meatinic antibioticus infection (hereinafter “MRSA”).

Plaintiff

At the present state 1), Plaintiff A’s climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic climatic clip

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1, 7, Eul evidence 1 (including satisfy number; hereinafter the same shall apply), each statement of evidence Nos. 1, 1, 1, and 1, each of the records of medical treatment against the roadside hospital of the Court, each request for physical examination, and commission.