logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2014.02.12 2013고단269
사기
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months and by imprisonment for six months.

However, this judgment is delivered to Defendant A.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who operates a removal company called D Co., Ltd., and Defendant B is a person who operates a real estate consulting company called E Co., Ltd., and the Defendants conspired to sell scrap metal to G as if he had the right to sell scrap metal to G who is aware of the fact, even though there is no right to sell scrap metal generated at the time of the above removal work, because there is no authority granted by the Korea Highway Corporation, which is the ordering authority, in connection with the freezing removal work in the Cheongju-si, Chungcheongbuk-si. Therefore, even though there is no right to sell scrap metal generated at the time of the above removal work, he/she has the right to sell scrap metal.

around 18:00 on December 19, 201, the Defendants displayed obstacles to G around November 201, 201, i.e., disposal of residuess and residual scrap metal construction contracts, corporate seal impression, etc. at I’s office located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H, and make a false statement to “this is the right to sell the whole quantity of scrap scrap metal generated from freezing warehouse removal works located in Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, and upon introducing a scrap metal business operator, G to deliver it.” On December 10, 201, at L office of the victim K management in Seo-gu, Incheon Metropolitan City, Seo-gu, for a period of time not exceeding 18:00 on December 19, 201, the Defendants concluded an exclusive contract, such as scrap metal, etc., which occurred from the removal of the freezing-si, 2000 on the aggregate of KRW 105:00 on the date of removal, 2010 on the pretext of sale from the victim.”

As a result, the Defendants conspired in collusion to deceiving the victim, thereby deceiving the victim 40 million won from the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ each.

arrow