logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2015.06.18 2014고단3879
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months and a fine of up to two million won.

However, the above imprisonment for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From October 20, 2014 to October 22, 2014, the Defendant operated a commercial sex trafficking business establishment with the trade name "D" from Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City's underground from October 20 to October 22, 2014, and had female employees E, F and G perform the similarity act.

Accordingly, the defendant committed commercial sex acts such as arranging sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol of E, F, and G;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc., choice of imprisonment and the concurrent imposition of fines (Article 24 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act to be confiscated;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. The basic area (six months to one year and four months) of the sentencing criteria [the scope of recommendations] and the basic area (one year and four months) of the types of sexual traffic crimes subject to 19 years of age or older, including brokerage, etc. of sexual traffic;

2. Determination of sentence shall be made in consideration of all factors of sentencing indicated in the record, such as the scale and period of the business in this case, the absence of the same kind of power, the fact that the defendant misleads the defendant, the age, occupation, character and conduct, family relationship, and circumstances before and after the crime

arrow