logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.11.23 2017고단3361
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 6, 2007, the Defendant was issued a summary order of a fine of two million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving), from the Suwon Friwon on July 8, 2013 to a fine of five hundred thousand won for the same crime, respectively, at the Seoul Southern District Court on June 25, 2015 and sentenced two years to a suspended sentence for six months on July 3, 2015 for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) at the Seoul Southern District Court.

On June 14, 2017, around 14:10, the Defendant driven a D-burled car with alcohol content of 0.229% while under the influence of alcohol from around 2km to around 6 internal circulation roads of 13 Cheongcheon-ro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, Cheongcheon-ro, Seoul.

Accordingly, the defendant, who violated the prohibition of drinking at least twice, was driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol in violation of the above provision.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. Notification of the results of regulating drinking driving;

1. Inquiries about the results of crackdown on drinking driving;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of an inquiry letter, such as criminal history, and an investigation report (Attachment to the same kind of force as the suspect);

1. Relevant legal provisions and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the selection of punishment for a crime, and the selection of imprisonment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act includes: (a) there was an enemy who was punished several times due to driving under the influence of alcohol for the reason of sentencing; (b) the crime of this case was committed during the period of probation even though the person was placed prior to the suspension of the execution due to driving under the influence of alcohol; (c) the figure of alcohol is very high; and (d) there was any inevitable reason for

In light of the circumstances, such as the fact that it is not possible to see and the fact that it is against.

arrow