beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On September 22, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment with labor due to interference with the execution of official duties in the Changwon District Court’s smuggling branch on September 2, 2016, and on February 2, 2017, the Defendant completed the execution of the sentence at the detention house.
On February 18, 2017, the Defendant: (a) reported that he was a victim of a disturbance in the front of D Marart located in C on February 18, 2017; and (b) sent to the site by the police officer F and G of the Stshing Police Station E Bureau, who called the scene after receiving a report from the victim of the disturbance in front of D Marart located in C, 2017.
Where there is a house, where there is an identification card.
“Along with the question of “I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am on the face and head of the police officer F and G. The police officer arrested the defendant on the charge of obstructing the performance of official duties and forced I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of police officers' duties concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. A written statement of F and G;
1. A photograph of the upper half of the police box and CCTV image images taken by the police box;
1. Previous convictions: Application of inquiries, such as criminal history, replys to inquiries and the current status of personal expropriations;
1. Where an act of assault and intimidation was committed against multiple public officials who perform the same duties as prescribed in Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act regarding criminal facts in the pertinent criminal facts, a crime of interference with the performance of multiple official duties is established according to the number of public officials who perform official duties (see Supreme Court Decision 2009Do3505, Jun. 25, 2009, etc.). On February 18, 2017, the act of obstructing the performance of official duties by the police officers F of the defendant and the police officers G, who were on the street before D Mart, 2017, was committed in the same opportunity at the same place, and is evaluated as one act under social norms.