The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case is erroneous in the misapprehension of the legal principle that there was no fact that the victim was the victim, and there was only a fact that the victim was the victim's own.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (fine 4 million won) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below, namely, ① the victim was the cab that the cab driven by the defendant in the name of the victim was faced with the cab that the cab driven by the defendant in the direction of the victim, and the defendant was faced with the vehicle that the cab driven by the defendant in the direction of the cab, ② the victim was called from I to ask the victim's location, and the cab driven by the defendant was later known of the fact that the cab driven by the defendant was not the Dosi that the cab was not the Dosi that the cab was driven by the victim. ③ At I's request, I moved his own phone to the defendant, ③ the victim was sent to the defendant by telephone, ③ The victim was rapidly released from the police station in Gwangju, ④ The victim was living in the direction of the police station in the direction of the victim, ④ The victim was living in the police station in the direction of the defendant, and the victim was living in the kel.