logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.02.11 2014가합4129
목욕장영업허가취소
Text

1. The defendant shall comply with the procedure for reporting the closure of business as stated in the attached Table 2 list to the plaintiff.

2...

Reasons

1. Indication of claim;

A. The Plaintiff is the Daejeon District Court, Daejeon District Court, No. 20496 on March 24, 2003, with respect to the portion of 1/2 among the buildings listed in the separate sheet No. 1 (hereinafter “instant building”).

B. On March 1, 2012, the Plaintiff leased the instant building to the Defendant with the term of KRW 30 million, KRW 3.5 million per month, and the term of lease from March 1, 2012 to March 1, 2015. The Defendant, upon filing a report on the business of public bath business (hereinafter “the instant report”) with the instant building as indicated in the attached Table 2, operated a public bath with the name of “C bath” as “C bath.”

C. The Plaintiff requested the Defendant to report the closure of the instant business report after the termination of the instant lease agreement, but the Defendant did not comply with this up to now.

Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to report the closure of the instant business report to the Plaintiff upon the termination of the lease agreement.

2. Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act (Judgment by public notice) of the applicable provisions of Acts;

arrow