The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The summary of the facts charged is a person who works in B market C.

On September 20, 2018, at around 00:10, the Defendant was subject to the control on the ground that he was driven while driving the electric vehicle while driving the electric vehicle in front of the Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan City B market, due to the violation of traffic classification from E from the circumstances of the Songpa Police Station D.

During the process of receiving the disposition of notice from the above E, the Defendant, while informing the above E of his personal information and did not yet receive the written disposition of notice of penalty, committed assault, such as assaulting the above E by driving the electric dynamic vehicle, which is a dangerous object, in the front and rear of the above E, by driving it in the front and rear of the above E, in a situation where the above E did not receive the written disposition of notice of penalty.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and interfered with the legitimate performance of police officers' duties of notice disposition.

2. The gist of the defendant's and his defense counsel's defense counsel's defense counsel's defense counsel's defense counsel's defense counsel's defense counsel's defense counsel's defense counsel's defense counsel's defense counsel's defense counsel's defense attorney's defense counsel's defense counsel's defense prevents the defendant from participating in the defendant's defense.

3. The crime of obstruction of performance of official duties under Article 136 of the Criminal Act is established only when the performance of official duties is legitimate. Here, legitimate performance of official duties refers to not only the abstract authority of a public official, but also the case meeting the legal requirements and methods for specific performance of official duties. Thus, even if an act of assault was committed against a public official who lacks such legitimacy, it cannot be viewed as a crime of obstruction of performance of official duties.

(See Supreme Court Decision 92Do506 delivered on May 22, 1992, etc.). Also, an offender denies the offense and receives a penalty payment notice.