logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.08.28 2013고정3643
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant of "2013 High Court 3643" is a person who was in a de facto marital relationship with the victim B (the age of 58) on the premise of marriage.

1. Around August 6, 2012, the Defendant called the victim’s telephoneed at 113 Dong-dong, Incheon Metropolitan City apartment C apartment 113 Dong 403, and tried to jointly purchase the land located in the former and the former and the former and the former and the latter and the latter were to purchase the land at the same time due to the urgent circumstances. The Defendant said that the land purchase funds would be repaid at a prompt time upon borrowing.

However, even if the victim borrowed money, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to repay it.

The Defendant received KRW 15 million from the victim to the Agricultural Cooperative Account (D) and acquired it by fraud.

2. Around September 4, 2012, the Defendant called “around September 4, 2012, the Defendant made a phone call to the victim working at the apartment restaurant of the E company located in Seo-gu Incheon Metropolitan City and agreed to import KRW 2.4 million per month as interest if he/she invests KRW 23 million in this place.”

However, the defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay profits to the victim by investing in the modern steel labor union.

The Defendant received KRW 10 million from the victim to the one bank account (F) on the above date, and received KRW 6 million in cash from Busan City, and received KRW 7 million in cash from the national bank account (G) and acquired KRW 23 million in total.

3. On September 19, 2012, the Defendant called “a promise to import KRW 2,40,000 per month if the Defendant invested KRW 10,000 to the farming association of the field of paddy field in the south-Namnam Sea is made by phone call to the victim at a place where it is not known.”

However, the defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay the profits to the victim by investing in the farming field of the paddy field in the Jeonnam Ocean Agricultural Cooperative.

The defendant has received from the victim a transfer of KRW 10 million from the victim to one bank account (H).

arrow