logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.09.22 2016나8622
명의신탁해지를원인으로한소유권이전등기
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The grounds for appeal by the plaintiff citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and even if evidence submitted in the court of first instance shows evidence No. 35 through No. 37 submitted in this court, the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance are justified.

Therefore, this court's reasoning is identical to the reasoning of the first instance judgment, except where the defendant's "the defendant" in the first instance judgment Nos. 3, 18, and 4 of the first instance judgment is deemed to be "the defendant's "the defendant", and therefore, it is cited by the main text of Article 420 of the

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed in entirety.

arrow