The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On July 13, 2014, at around 18:20, the Defendant, at the time of the 18:20th anniversary of the 13th day of the 19th day of the 19th day of the 19th day of the 19th day of the 19th day of the 20th day of the 20th day of the 19th day of the 20th day of the 20th day of the 19th day of the 20th day of the 20th day of the 20th day of the 20th day of the 20th day of the 20th day of the 20th day of the 20th day of the day of the 20th day of the day of the day of the day of the day of the day of the day of the day of the day of the day of the day

2. The judgment below is the crime stipulated in Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the express will of the victim pursuant to Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. The crime of intimidation is the crime stipulated in Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the express will of the victim pursuant to Article 283(3) of the Criminal Act. Since C, the victim, appearing as a witness in this court on March 4, 2014, stated that “the defendant does not want to be punished,” the prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.