(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.05.30 2014고정1149

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.05.30 2014고정1149

도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who operates C2.5t train owned by the Bank of Korea.

On October 5, 2013, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at a speed of about 50km in the speed of about 50km in front of the two-lanes in front of the exit 1276, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul.

Since there is an internal circulation road, there is a pole in the center of the road and the vehicle traffic volume is complicated, in such a case, a driver of the vehicle shall accurately operate the steering gear, brakes and other devices of the vehicle, shall not drive the vehicle at a speed or in such a manner as to inflict any danger or injury on others according to the road traffic situation and the structure and performance of the vehicle, and the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to ensure that the driver of the vehicle is obliged to safely report the traffic situation on the front side and to prevent accidents in advance by driving the vehicle safely.

Nevertheless, the defendant's negligence in violation of this, led to a conflict on the right side of the defendant's vehicle, where the part on the left side of the front-hand part of the victim's DNA driving E, which moved into three lanes in the same direction and changed into two lanes.

The Defendant, by such occupational negligence, destroyed goods that are equivalent to KRW 1,050,00,00 of the repair cost, such as the exchange of front-way vehicles of the above Ecoos vehicle, and the driver of the vehicle who damaged the goods due to traffic, such as driving of the vehicle, etc. shall immediately stop the vehicle and take necessary measures, such as checking whether there is any damage. However, the Defendant escaped in the direction of the front-way without taking any on-site measures after the

Summary of Evidence

1. Court statement of the defendant (the second trial date);

1. Statement on the occurrence of D traffic accidents;

1. A traffic accident report (1) actual survey report;

1. Written estimate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of vehicles (E), vehicle photographs (C), and screen pictures of the same kind;

1. Article 148 of the Road Traffic Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and the choice of punishment;

참조조문

-도로교통법 제148조

유사 판례

-서울중앙지방법원 2021.04.08 2020나53899

-서울중앙지방법원 2013.11.07 2013고정2579

-서울중앙지방법원 2013.10.17 2013고정4445

-서울동부지방법원 2016.10.05 2016고정1136

-광주지방법원 2014.01.16 2013고단5162