Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The summary of the facts charged is between Nonparty C and Nonparty C, who had been aware of the fact from three to four years.
Although the Defendant did not have internal ties D (ma, 60 years of age) and C, around November 22, 2016, the Defendant sent the Defendant’s cell phone Kakaox to C’s children E, F, and C’s cell phone Kakaoooox, G with the intent of the complainant and the complainant’s spouse, and thereby, damaged the honor of the complainant by openly pointing out false facts while transmitting the Defendant’s photograph stamped to D C’s children E, F, and C’s spouse.
2. Determination
(a) Crimes of non-violation of intention: Article 312 (2) of the Criminal Act;
B. On July 18, 2017, after the prosecution of this case, the victim D did not want to be punished against the defendant.
c) statement;
Judgment dismissing Public Prosecution: Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act