beta
Text
1. Defendant (Appointed Party) is KRW 22,759,520, and KRW 1,00,000 for Plaintiff A and KRW 500,00 for Plaintiff C and D, respectively.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On November 1, 2014, Plaintiff A driving the G Ortoba on or around 20:10, and driving along the secondary line from among the two lanes in front of the I stations located at H at Andong-dong-si, resulting in an injury, such as mination and crushing of the left-hand aggregate, which has ceased to be centered, and has ceased to be centered on the road, and suffered an injury, such as mination and crushing of the aggregate.
(hereinafter “instant accident”). (b)
The Defendant (Appointed Party; hereinafter “Defendant E”) is a construction business operator who was performing construction of retail stores, parking lot facilities, landscaping facilities, etc. on the ground of the Dong-si J (hereinafter “instant construction site”) in the vicinity of the accident site at the time of the instant accident, and the Appointer F is the owner of the said building and the owner who was entrusted the instant construction to Defendant E.
C. Plaintiff B is the wife of Plaintiff A, and Plaintiff C and D are the children of Plaintiff A.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 4-1, 2, and 10, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Whether liability for damages arises;
A. The plaintiffs' assertion 1) The plaintiff Eul's assertion that the plaintiff Eul, while driving the two-lanes at the time of the accident in this case, was set street on the floor of the road and went beyond the road. The above items are illegal acts that the defendant Eul, who was responsible for the construction works to be used by the defendant Eul at the construction site in this case, has neglected to manage the above items safely so as not to obstruct the passage of the road. The Selection is the contractor of the construction works in this case or the owner and possessor of the above items as the plaintiff Eul or the defendant E, who is the owner and possessor of the above items. The plaintiff Eul and the Selection are jointly and severally liable to compensate for the plaintiff Eul's physical, mental and physical damage, the plaintiff Eul, C, and D's mental damage caused by the accident in this case.