logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2018.04.18 2017고단1692
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 25, 2017, the Defendant: (a) on November 25, 2017, the Defendant: (b) asked “A” restaurant located in Sinsan-si, Sinsan-si, to pay the check in front of the KRW 3,00,00,000 at the drinking value; (c) the Defendant asked the Victim D (FY) “A 62 years of age”; and (d) said, “A fribbbbbine cribine cribine cribine cribine cribine cribus; and (d) the Defendant sent the frib

Habk Doz

“The victim’s restaurant business was obstructed by force for about 30 minutes, such as cutting off the table table, which was filled with a bath together, with the victim’s bath, by force.

2. On November 25, 2017, the Defendant: (a) obstructed the performance of official duties; and (b) obstructed the Defendant: (c) “Neine” to F for the police box affiliated with the Korea Military Police Station E commander of the Military Military Police Station, dispatched after receiving a report of 112 at

2.2 Doz. 10

“In doing so, the F was assaulted by hand, such as bather fating and salkeing bat.”

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to D or F;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing evidence photographs;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of public duties) and the choice of imprisonment for each crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The scope of the final sentence according to the aggravated punishment for multiple crimes without any basic area (referring to six months to one year and six months), the basic area (referring to interference with the execution of public duties) of Category 1 of the Sentencing (referring to six months to one year and six months) [the scope of the recommended punishment] [the scope of interference with the performance of public duties] and the basic area (referring to six months to one year and six months), the basic area (referring to interference with the performance of public duties and coercion of duties] of Category 1 (referring to six months to one year and six months): 6 months: 6 months to two years;

2. The offense of obstructing the performance of duties by assaulting a public official determined to be sentenced to punishment shall be deemed to be bad;

In addition, one defendant has a record of crimes related to multiple violence.

Such circumstances are disadvantageous to the defendant.

arrow