beta
Text
1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 307,618,958 with respect to the Plaintiff and the period from February 1, 2013 to December 23, 2014.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff is a juristic person established for the purpose of advertising, production of signboards, advertising agency, etc., and Defendant A Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Company”) is a juristic person established on September 15, 201 for the purpose of advertising agency, etc., and Defendant B is an internal director and stockholder of the Defendant Company.
B. (1) Daehan and eight bus companies representing the bus companies (hereinafter “D”)
F) On December 14, 2010, the operator of the “E” and the “E” are buses owned by the said eight bus companies (hereinafter “instant bus”) when F pays the media user fee to D Association on December 14, 2010.
(2) On June 24, 201, F entered into a contract with Defendant B’s Dong G (a personal advertising business chain was opened and operated on September 3, 2009, and was closed on June 22, 2012) under which G would pay F the user fee for media instead of inserting G in the first,224 external pages of the instant bus (a contract period between July 1, 2011 and August 31, 201).
3) The F and the Defendant Company on August 24, 201, premised on the establishment of the Defendant Company (the same year as the contract term)
9.1. From January 30 to the 30th of the same month and the same year.
9. 23. (Contract Period from October 1 to December 31 of the same year) The Defendant Company entered into a contract with F to pay the user fee for media instead of inserting an advertisement in the above 1,224 external pages.
C.1) Around December 201, the Plaintiff entered into a contract on vicarious execution of DNA advertising business with the purport that F may exercise the Plaintiff’s right to use a medium for the outside side of the instant bus owned by F to DD. (2) The Plaintiff and the Defendant Company set the advertising period up to December 31, 2012, with the maximum advertising period up to December 31, 2012, minus the Defendant Company from attracting, manufacturing, and installing advertising outside of the instant bus and receiving advertising fees from the advertiser at the end of the following month at the request of the Plaintiff at the end of each month.