The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Some of the facts charged were corrected.

At around July 17, 2016, the Defendant’s following: (a) around 17, 2016, at the Stockholm public conference; (b) during the participation of the conversation name “B,” “C,” “D,” etc.,” “E (the victim’s victim’s victim’s victim’s victim’s victim’s victim’s victim’s victim’s victim’s victim’s victim’s victim’s victim’s victim’s victim’s victim’s victim’s victim’s victim’s victim’s victim’)

네 말하는 거나 보면 이상함”, “ 사람들 다 티 나오고 ㅋㅋㅋ 그럴 때는 오히려 걔네

들 묻히는데 단독으로 움직일 때가 좀 소름 ㅋ”, “E 걔는 좀 허언 증이 있는 듯 말 섞지 마 세요, 진짜 미친자 지능도 좀 이상함 대화가 안 되 여 사회생활 해본 거 맞는지”, “ 이제 알아서 짜지겠죠

"............. 1% panty expressed by H in an interview with the media is the victim.

“B” to the effect that “I am pan pan pan pan pan pan pan pan pan pan pans

The victim publicly insultingd the victim by referring to “Nebaging” and “Nebaging”.

Judgment

The facts charged in the instant case constitute Article 311 of the Criminal Act, which can be prosecuted only when an accusation is filed pursuant to Article 312(1) of the Criminal Act.

According to the records, it is recognized that on December 1, 2017, after April 27, 2017, an indictment of this case was filed, the victim's agent submitted to this court a written withdrawal of complaint with respect to the withdrawal of complaint against the defendant.

Therefore, the public prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the public prosecution of this case constitutes a case where a complaint is withdrawn with respect to a crime which is to be prosecuted only upon complaint.