logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2018.02.01 2017나5967
소유권이전등기
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the first instance judgment, except for the modification or addition of two parts of the judgment of the first instance as follows. As such, this is cited in accordance with the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The third part of the third part adds “with respect to the instant land” to “the fact that the registration for the preservation of ownership in H was completed on January 20, 1932 by the Ulsan District Court receipt No. 250 of the Ulsan District Court’s receipt of the Ulsan District Court’s receipt.”

(b)Paragraph 13 of the third place shall not mean the following:

As to this case’s land, the Plaintiff asserted to the effect that the registration of transfer of ownership in the name of the Defendant was false registration in collusion with G as the Defendant’s punishment, but there is no evidence to acknowledge this. Therefore, the Plaintiff’s assertion on this part is without merit.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow