Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is the owner of orchard and C in Daegu Northern-gu B, and D is the person using C, and the above three times is the place where the development restriction zone is set.
1. Any person who installs illegal structures, etc. shall obtain permission from the head of a Si/Gun/Gu when he/she intends to construct a building or alter the purpose of use of a building, install a structure, change the form and quality of land, cut bamboo and trees, divide land, store articles in a development-restricted zone;
On November 2019, the Defendant laid down water tanks, plastic houses, and structural tanks, etc. with the aim of protecting the sprinks necessary for the mass, within the orchard located in Daegu Northern-gu B, Daegu-gu, with the aim of protecting the sprinks necessary for the mass, around November 2019, the Defendant laid down the sprinks, construction materials, and waste sprinks for the purpose of protecting the sprinks necessary for the mass c, and around April 2020, 561.8 square meters in the orchard located in the orchard located in the above B.
2. Violation of corrective order;
A. On March 9, 2020, the Defendant: (a) with respect to containers 1, 24 square meters in the vicinity of the orchard located in Daegu Northern-gu, Daegu-gu; and (b) with respect to goods stored in the same port as those stored in paragraph (1), and 1, from around April 9, 2020, the same year.
6. Until February, 200, the corrective order was not complied with even though the corrective order was issued by the competent authority to restore the original state to its original state on three occasions.
As a result, the defendant did not comply with the corrective order of the competent authority as the owner of the above three times.
B. On January 9, 2019, the Defendant: (a) from February 17, 2020 to February 17, 2020, installed D with a view to using D as a vehicle access road in Daegu North-gu, Daegu-gu, Seoul for the purpose of using D as a vehicle access road; and (b) the same year.
3. Until September 19, a corrective order was not complied with even though the corrective order was issued by the competent Gu office to restore the original state to its original state on two occasions.
As a result, the defendant did not comply with the corrective order of the competent authority as the owner of the above three times.
Summary of Evidence
1. As to the defendant's legal statement D.