The defendant shall be innocent.

1. On September 23, 2008, the Defendant: (a) registered the international marriage brokerage business in the name of Defendant’s wife D; (b) registered the international marriage brokerage business in the name of “F” in the name of “F; (c) discontinued the international marriage brokerage business in the above name D on November 23, 2010; (d) registered the international marriage brokerage business in the name of Defendant under the same name or G in the same name at the same place on December 14, 2010; and (e) the Defendant continued to engage in the international marriage brokerage business in the same form as his/her employees.

Meanwhile, while engaging in the international marriage brokerage business, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 50,00,000 on November 29, 2010, and the sentence became final and conclusive on December 14, 2010, and was unable to engage in the marriage brokerage business or to engage in such business until three years have passed since the enforcement of the sentence was imposed pursuant to Article 6 subparagraph 4 of the said Act, and thereafter, the Defendant was dismissed from office as of September 5, 201 as well as employees of the said international marriage brokerage office.

Therefore, the defendant could not engage in the marriage brokerage business since September 5, 201, and could not engage in that business, and there was no registration of the international marriage brokerage business since he could not engage in that business.

Nevertheless, on October 16, 201, the Defendant continued to engage in the international marriage brokerage business in the above G name in the said G name, and arranged I to marry with a female incompetuent with the name of the Vietnamndong-gun HI, and conducted international marriage brokerage without registering 32 Korean men from November 19, 201, from that time to November 19, 201, by arranging to marry with Vietnam, Cambodia, the Philippines, and Mongolian nationality women.

2. The Defendant, based on the legal issues of the instant case and the determination thereof, carried on business in the international marriage brokerage office registered in G name from October 16, 201 to November 19, 2012, and the prosecutor only borrowed another person’s name and used it as a formal appearance of registration.