logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.12.12 2014가단5064311
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Plaintiff A holds each claim of KRW 70,160,00 based on the executory exemplification of a notarial deed issued on February 2, 2005 by a notary public of a promissory note issued on February 2, 2005 by DBN Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “B”) and KRW 120,69,300 based on the executory exemplification of a notarial deed issued on October 5, 2005 by a notary public of a notarial deed issued on October 5, 2005, and KRW 120,069,30 based on the executory exemplification of a notarial deed issued on October 118, 2006, Plaintiff B holds each claim of KRW 127,589,760 based on the executory exemplification of a notarial deed issued by Nonparty Co., Ltd. on October 5, 2005.

B. On October 17, 2005, the non-party company transferred the claim for the construction cost of KRW 631,790,000 to the non-party company Samsung Electronic Co., Ltd (hereinafter “Tsung”) (hereinafter “instant transfer contract”) to C and D, and on October 18, 2005, notified the non-party company of the transfer of the above claim.

C. Samsung Industries deposited KRW 632,465,100 as Seoul Central District Court Decision 2006Hun920, and on May 26, 2006, the above court made a distribution schedule to distribute KRW 86,739,029 to F in the distribution procedure (E; hereinafter referred to as the “instant distribution procedure”) for the said deposit, KRW 49,990,738 to C C Co., Ltd., and KRW 80,285,125 to C and D, KRW 414,75,108 to C and D, and KRW 40,208 to G. D.

The plaintiffs and H, I, C, C, E, C, C, C, C, C, C, C, C, C, C, C, and D, C, C, D, and C, C, D and C, as the Seoul Central District Court 2006Kahap1038 on April 7, 2006, and C, C, D, and C, D, as the defendant on April 21, 2006.

arrow