(영문) 청주지방법원 2018.08.16 2018고정119

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 청주지방법원 2018.08.16 2018고정119

상해

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 6, 2017, 21:55 around 21:55, the Defendant left the victim’s face with the right bridge, on the ground that the Defendant seems to disregard the victim’s face, who is an employee of the original office company working at the same site as the Defendant, in front of the J Burial, and on the street in front of the J Burial, the Defendant went beyond the victim’s bridge with the right bridge.

As a result, the Defendant inflicted bodily injury on the victim, such as a hot spring, which does not have two main bodies in a open space, which requires approximately two weeks medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The legal statement of K;

1. Reporting on the arrest of a case;

1. Photographs (a photograph by capturingCCTV image data) and one CD (CCTV image data);

1. A medical certificate (the defendant and his defense counsel did not go beyond the victim at the time and place set by the defendant, but the face of the victim is not less than the victim and there was no intention of injury due to the damage;

However, the evidence duly adopted and examined, and in particular, CCTV video data CDs can be confirmed by the Defendant’s appearance at the same time as the victim’s head was scambling at the time of 01:53, and the fact that if a person’s head was scam and was scambling, it can be known that the other party’s head was scambling, and that the other party’s head was scambling, and that the Defendant also accepted the result of the injury while recognizing such circumstances.

As can be seen, at least the defendant can be recognized as having dolusent intention of injury.

Therefore, the above argument shall not be accepted) the application of the law.

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 257 of the same Act concerning the crime, the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

참조조문

-형법 제69조 제2항

-형법 제70조 제1항

-형법 제257조 제1항

유사 판례

-서울남부지방법원 2018.08.29 2018고단3201

-전주지방법원 군산지원 2018.11.28 2018고정41

-대전지방법원 홍성지원 2018.10.01 2018고단304

-대구지방법원 2019.09.26 2019고정657

-서울서부지방법원 2018.11.15 2018고정792