1. The plaintiff's claim against the main defendant B and the conjunctive defendant C is dismissed in entirety.

2...

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is an operator of the English Institute of English in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and the conjunctive Defendant C (hereinafter “Defendant C”) is a company that operated the franchise business of the English Institute of English Research. The primary Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “DefendantB”) was established on June 12, 2013, and is a company that operates the business after receiving the franchise business from Defendant C.

B. On June 20, 2012, the Plaintiff attended a business explanation meeting on the franchise store of the English Private Teaching Institutes organized by Defendant C while operating the English Private Teaching Institute as E’s content, and “F program” refers to the “F program, which is provided by the G University’s International Language Research Institute using the educational and content self-development and supervision.”

Upon hearing the explanation that it is, on June 20, 2012, the Defendant C entered into a franchise agreement with Defendant C, and commenced the business of an English private teaching institute using the F program from July 1, 2012, but has discontinued the operation of the English private teaching institute on June 2013.

2. For the convenience of the Plaintiff’s assertion, from the argument against the conjunctive Defendant C. A.

Defendant C, at the time of concluding the agreement with the Plaintiff on the franchise store agreement with the English Private Teaching Institutes, knew the Plaintiff that “The Plaintiff would provide English education with a teaching material that was self-development and assumption at the G University’s International Language Research Institute,” and that “The Plaintiff would provide English education with a material that was self-development and assumption at the G University’s International Language Research Institute,” thereby entering into a franchise store agreement with the Defendant C with the English Private Teaching Institutes.

(2) Due to the above tort committed by Defendant C, the Plaintiff totaled KRW 14,386,00,000 due to the installation of the interior works and facilities of the private teaching institute in Defendant C’s false horses.