logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2018.05.29 2016고단3846 (1)
폭행등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

2017 Highest 954

1. On June 20, 2016, at around 23:00 on June 20, 2016, the Defendant interfered with his/her duties, along with the joint Defendant B and C, performed alcohol at the “F” point operated by the victim E (59 years of age) on the first-class D underground floor in Gwanak-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and as a result of calculating the drinking value, the Defendant C, who was a victim and Si expenses, made the victim feel a bath, bling the head on the table table where he/she is located, and the Defendant B took a bath while the victim was sounded. Defendant B took a bath while the cell phone was lost, and Defendant A h d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d e at the main point.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the main business of the victim by force in collusion with the joint defendant B and C before separation.

2. On June 20, 2016, the Defendant: (a) seems to have fighting at the same place as indicated in paragraph (1) around 23:00; (b) the Defendant, at the same time and at the same time, reported that he was sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually, lost his mobile phone to H from among the Does, the police officer of the Seoul Gwanak-gu Police Station G police box sent to the site after having received a report of 112, which he heard the pertinent statement of the instant case; and (c) the Defendant: (a) reported that he was able to find out a mobile phone; (b) he was a police officer; (c) sought a mobile phone; and (d) reported that he was frighted with H’s chest’s chest by hand; and (d) reported that she was frighted with the outer booms that she had

As a result, the Defendant assaulted police officers H, thereby obstructing police officers' legitimate execution of their duties concerning handling of reported cases and protecting people's lives, bodies, and property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Ten-time public trial records on the witness E and witness I;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the accused, B, or C;

1. Each police statement made to H, E, and I;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Articles 314(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) (a) (a point of obstructing the performance of official duties) of the Criminal Act, and Articles 136(1) (a point of obstructing the performance of official duties) of the Criminal Act, and the choice

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Code of Aggravation of Concurrent Crimes;

arrow