The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

A. The Defendant agreed to substitute loan claims against Q for the repayment of the Defendant’s credit (However, L did not collect transfer money from Q thereafter; 129 pages of investigation records). The Defendant’s health status is not good, and the Defendant’s family and branch members want to take a preference against the Defendant is favorable to the Defendant.

However, the total amount of damages caused by the instant occupational breach of trust exceeds KRW 12 million, and the total amount of damages caused by the instant occupational breach of trust exceeds KRW 100,000,000,000 for the total amount of KRW 100,000,000,000,000 for total amount of damages caused by the instant occupational breach of trust; however, the victims have almost not been recovered, and there seems to be no possibility of recovery in the future; the circumstances and methods of the instant crime including the fact that the Defendant has fled for more than three years and the victims are expected to have suffered a big mental damage; the method and results of the instant crime; the sentencing guidelines for the crime; the range of recommendations given by the Supreme Court (one and half years - five months - five months - five months - five years - one hundred and half - one - one - half - one - half - one - half - one - half - one - half - one - half - one - half - one - half - one - half - one - one - half - more of the minimum total penalties (one 3 (one - one - half - one.).

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.