logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원안산지원 2016.01.13 2014가단6282
손해배상
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 14,467,518 among the Plaintiff and KRW 6,277,518 among the Plaintiff and KRW 8,190,000 from July 28, 2010.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. 1) The Plaintiff, in the name of “C”, carried out the pumps lending business. The Defendant was employed by the Plaintiff and worked as a concrete pumps driver on May 19, 2010. (2) On May 19, 2010, the Plaintiff lent D concrete pumps (hereinafter “instant pumps”) owned by the Plaintiff to KRW 1,30,000 per day on condition that the Defendant, who is a driver, is a driver, was driving engineer.

3) Accordingly, on May 19, 2010 and June 8, 2010 and July 9, 2010, the Defendant is the Gangnam-gu Seoul E-construction site (hereinafter “instant construction site”).

(B) On July 27, 2010, the Defendant installed the instant pumps at the instant construction site in order to perform concrete removal work on the direction of the head of the office at the scene of the construction site, etc. (i.e., the occurrence of accidents) and played a role in installing the instant pumps at the instant construction site in order to perform concrete removal work on July 27, 2010, in which the Defendant play a role as a tank to prevent the pumps from being exposed to the outer side of the vehicle.

The two left two of them are installed on the floor where concrete is removed, and two of the left side are installed on the floor where concrete is not removed.

2) However, since the floor where the left part of the pump of this case was installed is not properly covered by the ground after cutting the ground in the course of the construction work, and the ground was weak because it was not properly maintained, there was a ground subsidence in that place. Thus, there was a ground subsidence, and there was a ground subsidence, and there was an accident where the pump of this case was cut down and a ground subsidence was cut down in the ground, and where the pump of this case was cut back to the ground and the ice was cut back (hereinafter “the accident of this case”).

C. The Plaintiff’s lawsuit 1) The Plaintiff filed for the instant accident against the construction of the Sejong District Court No. 2010Kahap8423. The Plaintiff is liable for damages arising from the instant accident.

arrow