The defendant shall be innocent.

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in the operation of the Lone Star Co., Ltd.

On June 27, 2019, the Defendant driven the above 00:38, and proceeded at the speed of about 56 km as soon as possible, depending on one lane to the terminal of a super high bus in the direction E, the front of the D, which is located at the beginning of the city, was driven at the speed of about 56 km.

At the time of night, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by reducing speed to those engaged in driving business, keeping the front door well well, and safely proceeding safely.

Nevertheless, by negligence of neglecting this, the defendant neglected it, and instead proceeded to the right side of the Victim F (57) who was a building on the right side of the road from the left side of the defendant's proceeding, received the two parts of the body side of the victim F (57) from the defendant's driving on the right side.

Ultimately, around June 27, 2019, around 01:30 on June 27, 2019 due to the above occupational negligence, the Defendant caused the death of the victim due to cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral thom (Presumption)

2. In full view of the following circumstances, the evidence presented by the prosecutor alone that the Defendant was negligent on duty.

It is insufficient to conclude it, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

A. The speed of the instant road is 60 km per hour (the 7th page of the investigation record), the speed of the Defendant’s vehicle immediately before the accident is presumed to be 46.4 through 56.2 km per hour (the 89th page of the investigation record), and the Defendant observed the restriction speed.

B. At the time of the accident, the Defendant was engaged in the accident to the extent that the Defendant could safely drive, taking into account the aforementioned circumstances into account.

I seem to appear.

(c)

At the time of the accident, the victim was crossing the road without permission (5,58 pages of the investigation record), and it is not easy to anticipate that pedestrians will appear on their own in one side of the six-lane roads set up at the center of the road.

(d)

When the defendant is aware of the risk of collision and was in a sudden operation, it is dangerous at the point from 23.5 to 31.1m prior to the risk of collision.