(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.06.13 2019노959 | 리걸엔진

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.06.13 2019노959

사기

Text

The judgment below

Part concerning Defendant B, F, G, and H shall be reversed, respectively.

Defendant

B Imprisonment with prison labor of one and half years, Defendant .

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The sentence against the Defendants (Defendant A: 3 years and 6 months of imprisonment; 2 years and 6 months of imprisonment; 6 months of imprisonment; Defendant C; 1 year of imprisonment; 2 years of suspended execution; 1 year of imprisonment; 2 years of probation; 160 hours of community service work; 1 year of imprisonment; 1 year of imprisonment; and 1 year and 2 months of imprisonment) of the lower court is too unreasonable.

B. The Prosecutor’s sentence against the Defendants in the lower court is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. We examine the Defendants A, C, D, E and the Prosecutor’s arguments together.

The crime of this case leads to the so-called "Planning casino," in which the defendants play a role in advance and scambling a scambling with a scambling with a scambling by inducing the victim to carry a large amount of betting amount, and by inducing the victim to perform a large amount of betting amount, and by inducing the victim to pay the above amount of betting amount, the crime of this case is very poor in light of the expertise, intelligence, and planning of the crime, and its methods and contents, etc., the amount of the crime of this case is 57.8 million won, the amount of the acquired money by the defendant A is 320 million won, the amount of the acquired money by the defendant C and D is 37.8 million won, the amount of the acquired money by the defendant E reaches 237.8 million won, while the defendant A led to the crime of this case, it appears that the circumstances after the crime of this case are very poor, three times of the punishment of the defendant C, one of the criminal offenses to the defendant 1D.

On the other hand, the defendants led to the confession of the crime of this case and reflect their mistakes in depth, in the case of the defendant A, the investigative agency and the court below agreed with the victim L, N, and there was no criminal record exceeding the suspension of the execution of the same criminal record or imprisonment, and in the case of the defendant C and D, the judgment of the court below became final and conclusive

유사 판례

-의정부지방법원 2014.05.30 2014노259

-대구지방법원 2020.02.07 2019노4330

-울산지방법원 2017.12.08 2017노1068

-광주지방법원 2013.06.12 2013노670

-대구지방법원 포항지원 2016.03.31 2015고단1274