logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2021.02.04 2020구합6810
견책처분취소
Text

The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. After being appointed as a local administrative secretary on August 21, 2004, the Plaintiff promoted to a local administrative assistant (Grade VI) on July 1, 2018, and served in B waterworks and waterworks administrative team from January 10, 2019 to October 31, 2019.

B. On September 5, 2018, the Defendant entered into each of the “E Contract” of KRW 1.5 billion and “F Contract” of KRW 3 billion on October 16, 2019, between Co., Ltd., Ltd., and Co., Ltd. and D (hereinafter “C”), and the joint water unit comprised of them, and entered into each of the instant service contracts of KRW 1.5 billion (hereinafter “E Contract”). On March 15, 2019, between C and C, the Defendant entered into each of the instant service contracts of KRW 19,089,000 and the “G Contract” of KRW 1,767,000 (hereinafter “each of the instant service contracts”).

(c)

C The director I and the vice president of D paid KRW 750,00 of the meal cost to the 111 public officials, including the Plaintiff, in the daily restaurant "L" located in K on March 14, 2019.

(d)

As a result of a special audit on the public officials belonging to the Ministry of Administrative Safety, the fact of acceptance of the instant entertainment was confirmed, and the Defendant violated the duty of integrity under Article 53 of the Local Public Officials Act and prohibition of acceptance of money, valuables, etc. under Article 8 of the Act on the Prohibition of Requests for Improper Solicitation and Graft (hereinafter “Improper Solicitation and Graft”), by receiving entertainment equivalent to KRW 53,571 from C and D, a duty-related business entity, at the instant L-day restaurant on March 14, 2019 through a resolution of the Cheongbuk-do Personnel Committee on March 25, 2020.

For the reason that “the instant disciplinary action” is a disciplinary action that imposes an additional amount of reprimand and disciplinary action (two times the amount of KRW 53,571) pursuant to Articles 69(1) and 69-2 of the Local Public Officials Act and Article 2(1) of the Local Public Officials Discipline Rules (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

arrow