beta
Text
Defendant
The punishment against A shall be three years of imprisonment and two years of imprisonment for Defendant B.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[Sharing the roles of the licensing organization] The organization normally operates a call center in China, assumes a false fact against many unspecified persons in the Republic of Korea through the Internet, etc., and notifies them of false facts through the Internet telephone, etc., and in this context obtains property by means of receiving money directly from victims or allowing the account transfer. Such organization is composed of a number of accomplices who commit a crime by systematically sharing their roles in the process of committing a crime, such as: “total” planned and instructed to commit a crime; “induction” which calls from a call center in China to many unspecified persons in the Republic of Korea and notifies them of false facts; “induction” which misrepresents a financial institution, etc. and notifies them of false facts; “induction” which recruits a large number of unspecified persons in the Republic of Korea; “induction passbook recruitment” which solicits money to be used for defraudation; “induction” which withdraws money from a passbook; and “induction” which delivers money wired from victims; and “in the process of soliciting members”.
【Criminal Facts】
On the 13th floor of the FM apartment site in the Chinese nesia, the name French name French (C) and D (E) (hereinafter “E”) established a call center for the scaming crime, misrepresentation of the staff of the “GF bank” who is a financial institution in the Republic of Korea by calls to many unspecified people in the Republic of Korea, and misrepresentation of the staff of the “GF bank”, thereby obtaining money as a guarantee insurance premium, etc., and posted an advertisement on the Internet website, such as the recruitment of the staff of the office managing the Internet HH game server, in order to attract incentives to work at the call center.
Defendants: (a) around July 2017, each of the Defendants reported the advertisement to the influence of name, and (b) contacted to the influence of name, and (c) Defendant A was the same.