logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2017.01.24 2016고단4239
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2016 Highest 4239" Defendant worked as a delivery source at "D" located in Kimhae-si C, and became a friendship with victims who operate a restaurant.

1. On July 2015, the criminal defendant against the victim E may get the victim E to a cafeteria located in the F of the Kimhae-si, in G, and a cafeteria located in G, and the victim E to the victim E, which is greater than the place currently located on the side of the Yangsan River or Kimhae-gu.

On the other hand, I would like to find out whether it is possible to operate a restaurant in advance for high-ranking persons of the company.

It is much more likely that there are more incomes than now.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, the Defendant had no intention or ability to operate a restaurant within the company in other places even if he received money from the injured party, even if he received money from the injured party, and the Defendant had the intent to pay the money from the injured party.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received a cash of 6.5 million won from the victim on July 2015, 2015, from the first police officer, and issued the same year.

8.1. Around January 1, 200, by receiving KRW 4.5 million from the post office account (H) in the name of the Defendant, and by deceiving KRW 11 million in total.

2. On May 2016, the Defendant against the victim I may allow the victim to engage in a cafeteria in the “K cafeteria” operated by the victim I located in the J in Kimhae-si, Kim Jong-si on the date of May 2016.

For this reason, the money was given to those who operated the existing restaurant under the name of the premium, and the money was given in advance.

However, in fact, the defendant was urged at the time to pay the debt from the beneficiary, and the defendant was used to pay the debt even if he was paid the debt from the victim. In fact, the defendant did not have the fact that he had worked as the head of the department with the company located in the Jeju-do. Therefore, the money from the victim.

arrow