The defendant shall be innocent.

1. On February 16, 2013, at around 02:17, the Defendant: (a) destroyed and damaged the e-car owned by the victim D, which was parked in the underground parking lot of the 307 Dong-dong, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju, Seo-gu, Gwangju, by means of repair costs, the amount of KRW 2,310,304, G car owned by the victim F is equivalent to 2,310,304, with respect to repair costs; and (b) the Defendant destroyed the e-car owned by the victim H as an influent article presumed to be an influence of each driver’s seat, etc

2. The defendant asserts that although the time stated in the facts charged passes through the surrounding area of the above vehicle, he did not memory his behavior at the time under the influence of alcohol. However, even according to the CCTV images involved, he did not recognize the fact that he damaged the vehicle.

3. Determination

A. According to the circumstances that correspond to the facts charged, the following circumstances found by the evidence submitted by the prosecution, namely, (i) according to the CD screen image (parking CCTV), which was recorded by the above temporary light parking lot, the Defendant came from the end of the vehicle of F, and then the Defendant went to the end of the wall, and then the Defendant went to the end of the wall, and then entered the front of the wall, leaving the direction of the D’s driver’s seat and leaving the door to the wall, and leaving the CCTV installed. (ii) The Defendant’s walk recorded in the above image does not seem to be unbrupted under the influence of alcohol, but rather seems to be a normal form, and rather, there is a doubt in the Defendant’s statement to the effect that the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol at the parking lot of this case. (iii) In full view of the following circumstances, it is doubtful that the Defendant did not damage the vehicle, as above, by asking the repair cost and passbook number to one of the victims.

B. However, as seen above, the judgment is suspected of being convicted.