logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2016.09.20 2015가단88444
채무부존재확인
Text

1. On November 9, 2015, in relation to the accident that occurred during the operation of C vehicles from the window B of Changwon-si around 09:06.

Reasons

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with D as the owner of C vehicle (hereinafter “instant insurance contract”). The Defendant is a person who operates E (hereinafter “instant store”) at the window of Changwon-si and engages in the toy sales business.

B. Around 09:06 on November 9, 2015, F, the father of the foregoing D, went away from the road due to the care of the care of the care of the care of the care of the care of the care of the care of the care of the care of the care of the care of the care of the care of the care of the care of the care of the care of the care of the care of the care of the care of the care of the care of the

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiff's assertion 1) The defendant asserts that toy located in the store due to the damage of the glass of the store of this case caused damage to KRW 4,612,00. However, the defendant asserts that the defendant demanded excessive damages even though the damage amount occurred due to the accident of this case was 2,102,74 won, the defendant sought confirmation of the existence of the obligation. 2) The defendant asserts that the defendant sought confirmation of the existence of the obligation due to the accident of this case: ① 2,84,035 won, ② operating loss 1,185,160 won, ③ ③ 320,00 won, ④ 1,80,000 won for the storage of the damaged goods, ④ 2,885,300 won for the storage of the damaged goods, ④ 3,825,300 won for the reconstruction related expenses, ⑤ 3,825,300 won for the care and the complete glass, and thus, the damage equivalent to 100,1008 won for compensation.

B. As seen earlier, the Plaintiff, the insurer of the instant vehicle, is the fact that the glass of the instant store was damaged due to the instant accident regarding the determination of the occurrence of the liability for damages.

arrow