The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. 공소사실의 요지 피고인은 2013. 1. 24.경 SNS 카카오스토리에 “참 이상한 나라의 엘리스 같은 어린이집이다. 아이가 점심시간에 밤늦게 먹고 잘 삼키지 않는다고 땅콩(꿀밤비슷한거) 주는 어린이집, 아이들 앞에서 출퇴근복 하의를 갈아입는, 매일 4시에 퇴근하는 담임을 어느 엄마는 체육대회날 처음봤다고 한다 말 안들으면 누구 엄마 오지마세요하며 불안을 고조시키는 선생님의 보육경력은 7년 되었다는데 원장은 선생님들이 훌륭하다한다. 아마도 아이들에게 보다 원장에게 잘하는 선생님이 훌륭한가보다 진정으로 신뢰할 수 있는 어린이집 과연 몇곳이나 될는지..아이가 무척 가기 싫어하는 어린이집을 굳이 보내야만할까“라는 글을 게시하고, 2013. 1. 31. SNS 카카오톡을 통해 피고인의 자녀와 함께 B어린이집을 다니고 있는 보육생의 부모인 C에게 위 글을 전송하였다.

However, in fact, the victim D, who is a member of the defendant's child, was not at the time of the point of occupation, when the infant was not boomed. There was no fact that the child was boomed before the child, and there was no fact that the child said that the child was boomed, and the child was working up to 17:30.

Nevertheless, for the purpose of slandering, the Defendant revealed publicly false information through the information and communications network, thereby impairing the honor of the victim D.

2. The facts charged of the instant case are crimes falling under Article 70(2) of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc., which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s will specifically manifested pursuant to Article 70(3) of the same Act. The records reveal that the victim withdraws his/her intent to punish the Defendant on January 15, 2014, which was after the prosecution of the instant case was instituted. Thus, Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act is applicable.