logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2014.12.11 2014고단1425
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment of 10 months, Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 50,000 won, respectively.

Defendant

B The above fine shall not be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A is a person who operates a commercial sex trafficking business in the name of ‘‘(D’’ in the 3rd, East-gu, Dong-gu, Seoul.

The defendant from May 21, 2014 to the same year.

7. Until October, 100, by having 12 marina rooms and shower facilities in the above business place, female sexual traffic, such as B, etc., employed female customers and find their places, and guiding them to a marina room with 120,000 won in return for sexual traffic and having sexual intercourse with female customers, thereby arranging sexual traffic.

2. Defendant B, around 01:00 on July 10, 2014, received 70,000 won from A in return for sexual traffic, and brought about sexual intercourse with a male guest who found the said place of business one time to sexual intercourse.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A suspect interrogation protocol of public prosecutor E;

1. A criminal investigation report by the prosecutor (report on calculation of criminal proceeds);

1. Application of Part 1 of the Act and subordinate statutes to field photographs, the statement of transactions by agricultural cooperatives, and monetary statements;

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

(a) Defendant A: Article 19(2)1 of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. and choice of imprisonment;

B. Defendant B: Article 21(1) of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc.

1. Article 70 (1) and Article 69 (2) of the Criminal Act in the custody of a workhouse (Defendant B);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Defendant A);

1. Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic;

1. For the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, Defendant A’s sentencing order (Defendant B), the period of arranging sexual traffic and sexual traffic, the size and operation method of a sexual traffic business establishment, criminal proceeds acquired by arranging sexual traffic and sexual traffic, the degree of the Defendants’ participation, the degree of the Defendants’ participation, the absence of the same criminal power, and all the sentencing factors indicated in the pleadings, such as the degree of reflectivity after the crime, shall be determined by taking into consideration

arrow