1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) Among the land size of 174.5 square meters in Busan Dong-gu, Busan Metropolitan City, each point is indicated as follows: (4), (5), (6), and (7).

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On August 27, 199, the Plaintiff is a person who acquired the ownership of 174.5 square meters in the Dong-gu Busan Metropolitan City (hereinafter “instant site”) and the building on its ground.

The defendant is a person who acquired the ownership of D. 83.2 square meters and ground buildings adjacent to the site of this case on April 23, 1998.

나. 현재 이 사건 대지상에는 피고 소유 주택의 지붕 중 일부가 별지 도면 표시 ④, ⑤, ⑥, ⑦, ④의 각 점을 순차로 연결한 선내 ㈏ 부분 3㎡에, 피고 소유 가스배관이 별지 도면 표시 ⑫의 ㈑ 부분에 각 설치되어 있다.

또한, 2017년경 피고 소유 주택의 벽과 지붕을 수선하기 이전부터 원피고 소유 각 대지의 경계를 위한 담장 역할을 하던 담장이 이 사건 대지 중 별지 도면 표시 ①, ②, ⑩, ⑪, ①의 각 점을 순차로 연결한 선내 ㈐ 부분에 건립되어 있었다.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without a partial dispute, Gap evidence 1-1-2, 3, 4, Gap evidence 1-2-1, 2, Gap evidence 4, Gap evidence 5-1 and 2-2, the result of the on-site inspection by this court, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. The plaintiff asserts that (i) the part of the wall removal is necessary to remove the wall of this case, since the defendant installed and occupied the wall for boundary on the site of this case owned by the plaintiff.

In regard to this, the defendant did not have opened a fence of this case on the site of this case, and argued that he did not have an obligation to remove the wall because all the owners of the site of this case and the land owned by the defendant were established.

Boundary marks, fences, ditches, etc. set up on the boundary of Sheet Judgment shall be presumed to be co-owned by the adjoining neighbors unless they are constructed at the sole expense of either of the adjoining neighbors or the fences are part of a building.

(Article 239 of the Civil Act). On the other hand, co-owners are obliged to remove the building or structure jointly owned within the limit of their share.