A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Of the facts charged in the instant case, the charge that attempted to proceed is not guilty. It is decided against the Defendant.

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 28, 2010, the Defendant posted an article to the effect that “The Defendant, while acting as a flag for a franchise in a newspaper area of E newspaper, she would bring the Victim D Co., Ltd. (a trade name after the alteration: G Co., Ltd.; hereinafter “D”) who is entrusted with F to receive the money in the name of advertising expenses by giving the victim Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “D”) who is in charge of the operation of F and receive the money in the name of advertising expenses, and that “the female Co., Ltd. is a suspicion of suspicion that the F Co., Ltd. will give a certain company a preference of eight years or more for the entrusted management of the private sector.

Then, around September 2010, the defendant found the victim D head office located in Daejeon Dong-gu, Daejeon, and demanded the regular director, who is the head office of the operation business, to make the advertisement expenses. If the advertisement expenses are not paid, the victim D who is obligated to make a contract with the female-gun on a three-year basis did not make a contract renewal.

As above, on November 15, 2010, the Defendant conspiredd with the victim D, the head of the headquarters for the operation of the victim D, and received KRW 2.2 million from the victim D, using the Nonghyup account (Account Number: J) of the E-Examination Co., Ltd.

2. When the defendant who will be present to K was detained on April 16, 2009 at the office of the branch office of the Suwon District Prosecutors' Office, and was detained on the charge of serving in the branch office of the Suwon District Prosecutors' Office (Yan District Court Branch Branch 2009Kadan274), the defendant appointed L law firm as a defense counsel on May 15, 2009 and applied for release on bail on May 15, 2009, but the decision was delayed, when the defendant appointed the victim K (45 years old) as a defense counsel on May 26, 2009, he agreed to pay 40 million won as a contingent fee at the time of release on bail. On the same day, when the defendant was released on bail on June 3, 2009, the defendant paid 30 million won out of the above contingent remuneration to the above victim.

As above, the defendant did not submit to the court the appointment of counsel in spite of the fact that the above victim and the above M.