1. The defendant shall enter the claim amount in the annexed sheet and the quoted amount column for the plaintiff A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, J, K, and L.

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant is a workplace that ordinarily employs approximately fifty workers. From February 1986, the Defendant: (a) concurrently operates a business that collects and transports wastes discharged from an individual workplace according to an individual waste disposal contract with gold-free, etc. (hereinafter “industrial wastes”); and (b) a business that collects and transports household wastes (hereinafter “domestic wastes”) from the Gwangju Mine Office in accordance with the contract with the Gwangju Mine Office to collect and transport household wastes; and (c) from December 2006, the Defendant is operating only a business that collects and transports household wastes.

B. The Plaintiffs, who were or were workers belonging to the Defendant (Plaintiff M, N,O, P, Q, and R were dead on January 1, 2013), was admitted to the Gwangju Regional Regional Trade Union for the employees belonging to the Defendant (S branch; hereinafter the instant trade union) around August 2005, and joined the Gwangju Regional Trade Union for the entire employees of the Gwangju Regional Trade Union after withdrawal from the instant trade union around May 8, 2012.

C. On May 1, 2007, the instant trade union, the head of Gwangju Metropolitan City, etc. entered into a collective agreement each year after the first agreement on wages and working conditions for street cleaners in the Gwangju metropolitan area of "the increase of wages in 2007 shall comply with reference materials for compilation of the budget of the Ministry of Government Administration and Home Affairs". The Defendant has paid wages to workers according to the aforementioned collective agreement or reference materials for compilation of the budget of the Ministry of Public Administration and Security.

Some workers belonging to the defendant, including the plaintiffs (excluding plaintiff P), filed a lawsuit against the defendant for wage claim against the defendant, such as Gwangju District Court 201Ga1325, by asserting that the defendant had paid overtime work allowances based on ordinary wages calculated by deducting the additional continuous service charges, etc. from ordinary wages even though they have been subject to ordinary wages.

E. The above court on June 9, 201.