1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) deliver the buildings listed in the separate sheet;

B. From July 20, 2015, the above A

subsection (b).

Comprehensively taking account of the purport of each statement in Gap evidence 1-1 through 4 and Gap evidence 2-4, the plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the defendant on October 20, 2014 on the attached list (hereinafter "the building of this case") with a deposit of KRW 8 million, monthly rent of KRW 1.8 million, and the period from October 20 to October 19, 2016. The plaintiff was subject to the disposition of the landlord at the end of the second month of the year, and the expenses incidental thereto were borne by the tenant, and the tenant paid the deposit of KRW 8 million with a balance after deducting the overdue rent and management expenses, and the contract of this case was lawfully concluded on October 20, 2015 with respect to the contract of this case from the date of the conclusion of the contract of this case to the end of 1.3 million, the plaintiff was found to have occupied the building of this case by the defendant on October 20, 2015 and notified the defendant on March 25, 2015.

Therefore, the defendant is obligated to deliver the building of this case to the plaintiff and pay the amount of unjust enrichment equivalent to the rent of KRW 1980,000 per month from July 20, 2015 to the completion date of delivery of the building of this case.

If so, the plaintiff's claim shall be accepted for the reasons and it is so decided as per Disposition.