The plaintiff's appeal and the claims extended by this court are dismissed, respectively.

The costs of appeal and the claims in this court.

The court's explanation of this case is identical to the remaining part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is dismissed or added as follows. Thus, it is acceptable to accept this case as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Of the grounds of the judgment of the first instance, the details of the 7th to 8th of the 7th of the 7th of the appeal are as follows.

A) - Monthly rent of 198,40,00,00 for revenues (582,65,233) from E, F and its own land and new building on the ground, E, F - Monthly rent of 1,40,00,00 for lease of the above land and new building on the ground (31 months) - 69,44,250 - Of the Defendants’ investment funds, 209,44,250 - 209,76,787,782, E-F's investment principal - 1,47,788,864,897,897, 1,141,1467,979, 197, 2957, 297, 2596, 297, 197, 2597, 1967, 2597, 197, 1967, 297, 1975

3. Ultimately, the Defendants, who are parties to the above agreement, are obligated to pay to each Plaintiff 468,309,097 won including KRW 176,981,481 won and the settlement amount of KRW 291,327,616, and damages for delay.

Of the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance, the contents of Section 8 below are as follows. “Chump” (1) The method and settlement of the project according to the business location of the Plaintiff and Defendant C, respectively.