A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a Hegel car.

1. A person who violates the Road Traffic Act (driving) by driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol on January 14, 200, with a blood alcohol content of 0.164% on January 14, 2007, and with a blood alcohol content of 0.183% on September 16, 2009, respectively, and violates the prohibition on driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol not less than twice.

On March 9, 2012, at around 19:00, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol content of 0.174% on the road located around approximately 3 km from the alcohol house, where it is difficult to find out the trade name near the barracks Dong in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu to the Northwest of the prosperity school located in the same Gu-dong.

2. The Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, while under the influence of alcohol with 0.174% of the blood alcohol concentration in the above temporary border, was driving the said vehicle and driving the said vehicle on the one-lane road along the riverside northwest-dong, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu toward the direction of the prosperity from the distance of furniture.

Since the place is marked on the right side on the road and the right side is prohibited, there was a duty of care to make a left turn to the person engaged in driving service.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, neglected to turn to the left as above, was driven by the victim D(60 years of age) who was driving from the south side of the prosperity Station to the rooftop-Dong by the negligence of driving the four-lane road above the prosperity intersection, and was driven by the victim D(60 years of age).

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered, by such occupational negligence, injury to the victim D, such as salt, tension, etc. of the bones of verte, which requires medical treatment for about three weeks, and injury to the victim FF (the age of 25) who was accompanied by the said taxi to undergo approximately two weeks’ medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statements made to the accused in the first trial record;