logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2020.05.21 2020고단918
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On July 22, 2019, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 4 million by the Gwangju District Court for a violation of the Road Traffic Act.

【Criminal Facts】

On February 26, 2020, the Defendant, without obtaining a driver’s license on February 12:45, 2020, driven E-Poter truck from Cju points located in Jeonyang-gun B to D points in Jeonyang-gun, Jeonyang-gun, Jeonyang-gun, with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.040%.

Accordingly, the defendant violated the prohibition of drinking driving more than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. The circumstantial statement of the employee;

1. Previous convictions indicated in judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (Attachment to summary orders of the same kind of power);

1. Relevant Article 152 subparagraph 1 of Article 152 of the Road Traffic Act, Article 43 of the Road Traffic Act, Article 148-2 (1) and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting a crime (the point of running a sound driving);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, including the criminal records of the defendant, the nature and risk of the crime of this case, the background of the crime, the degree of taking the crime, the family relationship, the health condition of the defendant, and the possibility of recidivism, shall be determined by taking into account the various sentencing conditions as shown in the records and arguments of this case.

arrow