A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

At around 17:30 on June 30, 2019, the Defendant: (a) while driving a stop in the 344th floor of the 3rd floor of the 3rd floor of the 2019 World Cup, the Defendant: (b) told the victim to have a stop in the 344th floor of the 3rd floor of the 3rd floor of the 3rd floor of the 3rd floor of the 3rd floor of the 3rd floor; (c) the victim saw the back of the stop; and (d) the stop of the stop; and (d) after completing the stop and the stop, the stop of the stop, the stop of the stop and the head of the stop of the stop of the stop that the stop caused the stop of the stop of the stop for about 42 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning B;

1. Investigation report (specific suspect);

1. Two copies of the medical certificate of injury;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of the body part of the victim;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. The instant crime on the grounds of sentencing under Article 53 and Article 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation is deemed to have inflicted bodily injury on the victim by putting the part of the victim’s head falling under the body higher than the Defendant at least three times with a shouldered brick. As such, the form and method of committing the instant crime is bold, and thus, the risk is high.

In addition, it seems that the victim suffered serious mental suffering from the defendant'sless attack, as well as the degree of damage caused by the crime, it is important that the victim suffered serious mental suffering.

Therefore, the illegality of the instant crime is high.

Furthermore, even in the past, the Defendant had been punished for the crime of injury, but again committed the crime of this case, and in this respect, there is a high possibility of criticism for the crime of this case.

The victim submitted a written application to the effect that he was unable to receive a true apology from the defendant, and submitted it to the defendant.