The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The determination of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) is unreasonable.

2. The sentence imposed by the court below is within the scope of the recommended sentencing guidelines (from June to June) in accordance with the annexed sentencing guidelines.

In consideration of the defendant's reflectivity, criminal history, partial payment of interest, health status, etc., the punishment was imposed in consideration of the nature of the crime, the scale of damage and recovery of unrec

The court below did not err in selecting and applying sentencing factors, and there is no change in sentencing factors in the appellate court.

Even if this Court re-examines the sentencing factors and other factors of sentencing that are set forth in the sentencing guidelines for fraud, the amount of the original sentence is inappropriate.

3. The appeal by the defendant is without merit.

Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act is dismissed.