Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On June 28, 2013, at around 23:55, the Defendant driven a B rocketing taxi and proceeded at a speed of about 20 km in the speed of 20 km in accordance with the first speed of Yung-dong, Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul with the second line road of 411-38 in front of Yung-dong from the sloping-dong of the sampling. Since a signal, etc. was installed in the front section of the said road, the Defendant neglected the duty of care to reduce speed and safely drive the road in accordance with the new subparagraph, and neglected the duty of care to prevent the person engaged in driving the vehicle from driving in violation of the signal, and caused the victim C (28 years old), the victim D (23 years old and inn), the victim E (28 years old) to the front part of the taxi driving on the right side of the Defendant, and suffered from the victim for treatment of approximately 2 weeks on the right side of the said road, and the victim for approximately 3 weeks to the victim for treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Detailed descriptions of each traffic accident situation statement prepared by D, E, and C;

1. Entry of a traffic accident report;

1. Each description of each written diagnosis;

1. Application of each of the visual Acts and subordinate statutes to a photographic image cover;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents in the Selection of Punishment, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. The following facts: (a) the degree of injury of the victim E on the grounds of the sentencing of Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act to be sentenced to the detention of the workhouse, and the victims did not agree with the victims; (b) the victims were at night crossing the bus without permission from the opposite line from the bus behind the bus; (c) there are considerable negligence in the occurrence of the traffic accident; (d) the vehicle of the defendant being admitted to the mutual aid association; and (e) there is no criminal history to take into account the sentencing of the defendant;