The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., both types of imprisonment and six months) of the lower court’s punishment is deemed to be too unhued and unfair.

2. The determination of sentencing is based on the statutory penalty, with a discretionary determination that takes place within a reasonable and appropriate scope, taking into account the factors constituting the conditions for sentencing prescribed in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, based on which our Criminal Procedure Act, which takes the trial-oriented principle and the principle of directness, has a unique area of the first instance trial regarding the

In addition, considering these circumstances and the ex post facto nature of the appellate court, it is reasonable to respect the sentencing conditions in the event that there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared with the first instance court, and the sentencing of the first instance court does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, and to refrain from rendering a sentence that does not differ from the first instance court on the sole ground that the sentence of the first instance falls within the reasonable scope of discretion, even though the sentence of the first instance court is somewhat different from the opinion of the appellate court.

(See Supreme Court en banc Decision 2015Do3260 Decided July 23, 2015). The lower court, taking full account of the overall circumstances regarding the sentencing of the Defendant’s sentencing, determined the punishment within the scope of the recommended sentencing guidelines, and did not find any circumstances that may be particularly considered in the trial.

The circumstance cited by the prosecutor as the reason for appeal is an element that has already been determined by the lower court as well as sufficiently taken into account when determining the punishment, and even if examining the various factors of sentencing as shown in the argument in this case closely, it cannot be said that the lower court’s sentencing is unfeasible to the point that it exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion

The prosecutor's assertion of unfair sentencing is not accepted.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.