Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

Defendant

A fails to pay the above fine; 50.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant Co., Ltd.”) is a company that conducts washing business at the place of business located in Yangsan City, and Defendant A is a representative director of the Defendant Co.

A business operator who manufactures, imports, sells, keeps, stores, transports or uses poisonous substances in connection with the relevant business shall comply with the following standards for the control of poisonous substances:

- The storage facilities should be kept at a minimum quantity input a day in the workplace that directly uses poisonous substances.

In such cases, the relevant poisonous substance shall be kept and used safely at a certain place, and a mark of poisonous substance on containers or packages shall be seen well.

1. Around October 17, 2012, the Defendant, as the representative of the Defendant Company, kept approximately 150 km in excess of the volume (20 km) which puts a toxic substance into the Defendant Company’s workplace and a day a toxic substance (NOH) in relation to the Defendant Company’s business, and kept approximately 150 km on the packages of the said Gamatica so that the mark of toxic substance may not be easily seen because it did not put a separate Korean toxic substance on the packages of the said

2. The Defendant Company: A, a representative of the Defendant Company, committed the act described in paragraph 1 in relation to the business of the Defendant Company.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A letter of business trip;

1. A written confirmation of violation;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. The Defendants of the relevant criminal facts: Articles 62, 60 subparagraph 4, and 24 subparagraph 5 of the Toxic Chemicals Control Act;

1. Defendant A who is selected to impose a fine;

1. Defendant A at a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act or more.